If not Trump, What?
Mr. Brooks hideous unspoken answer to his question is Hilary Clinton, that’s what. What Hilary and Mr. Brooks represents, is not the answer.
The article referenced is by David Brooks. Published on: April 29, 2016. If Not Trump, What? Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/opinion/if-not-trump-what.html?ref=opinion&_r=1
Donald Trump now looks set to be the Republican presidential nominee. So for those of us appalled by this prospect — what are we supposed to do?
Again Mr. Brooks, the only choice for this election would be to vote Clinton.
Well, not what the leaders of the Republican Party are doing. They’re going down meekly and hoping for a quiet convention. They seem blithely unaware that this is a Joe McCarthy moment. People will be judged by where they stood at this time. Those who walked with Trump will be tainted forever after for the degradation of standards and the general election slaughter.
The left is always tainted because left is futile. The problem is the tainted leftist mob does not care so long as it can continue to live large running its redistribution business.
This isolation tactic to “taint forever” all support against leftism and in this case for Trump is classic leftist warlord fair. Later in this article, Mr. Brooks will be looking for the “triumph over isolation.” However, he’ll leave his victims isolated forever.
As to the degradation of standards, what does he care? Does anyone believe Hilary and her email server degradation of standards will be punished by the redistributionists? It would not be good for business.
The better course for all of us — Republican, Democrat and independent — is to step back and take the long view, and to begin building for that. This election — not only the Trump phenomenon but the rise of Bernie Sanders, also — has reminded us how much pain there is in this country. According to a Pew Research poll, 75 percent of Trump voters say that life has gotten worse for people like them over the last half century.
The left can not solve the problems. It’s leadership are greedy creeps looking for wealth and power they glean by running the redistribution business. No one can ever trust them because their greed will be manifest soon enough. The animal farm pigs will move into the farm house (as they did in George Orwell’s Animal Farm). The only option against this futile redistributing leadership is to defeat it at each opportunity, not step back and take the long view. We’ve seen the long view and it is not leftist.
This declinism intertwines with other horrible social statistics. The suicide rate has surged to a 30-year high — a sure sign of rampant social isolation. A record number of Americans believe the American dream is out of reach. And for millennials, social trust is at historic lows.
Leftism is futile. Leftist leadership run a futile business for their own gain. I believe the suicide rate in the military has also risen sharply in the recent past as their sacrifice has been brought to futility as the left has risen.
Trump’s success grew out of that pain, but he is not the right response to it. The job for the rest of us is to figure out the right response.
Leftist leadership running their greedy redistribution business and their supporters will be tainted forever as the futility of leftism’s disease runs its course to the ruin of our nation. There will be no cessation of debt as long as leftist leadership, supporters, hold influence. You won’t find the right response in the redistribution business.
That means first it’s necessary to go out into the pain. I was surprised by Trump’s success because I’ve slipped into a bad pattern, spending large chunks of my life in the bourgeois strata — in professional circles with people with similar status and demographics to my own.
To repeat, the animal farm pigs move into the farm house. The redistribution business is good? Your efforts to hold onto the business and get Hilary elected won’t stop the institutionalized futility of effort your business inflicts. The pain will only grow. Leftism is not the answer which means your efforts to sustain it are futile.
It takes an act of will to rip yourself out of that and go where you feel least comfortable. But this column is going to try to do that over the next months and years. We all have some responsibility to do one activity that leaps across the chasms of segmentation that afflict this country.
We’ll probably need a new national story. Up until now, America’s story has been some version of the rags-to-riches story, the lone individual who rises from the bottom through pluck and work. But that story isn’t working for people anymore, especially for people who think the system is rigged.
I don’t know what the new national story will be, but maybe it will be less individualistic and more redemptive. Maybe it will be a story about communities that heal those who suffer from addiction, broken homes, trauma, prison and loss, a story of those who triumph over the isolation, social instability and dislocation so common today.
We’ll probably need a new definition of masculinity, too. There are many groups in society who have lost an empire but not yet found a role. Men are the largest of those groups. The traditional masculine ideal isn’t working anymore. It leads to high dropout rates, high incarceration rates, low labor force participation rates. This is an economy that rewards emotional connection and verbal expressiveness. Everywhere you see men imprisoned by the old reticent, stoical ideal.
We’ll also need to rebuild the sense that we’re all in this together. The author R.R. Reno has argued that what we’re really facing these days is a “crisis of solidarity.” Many people, as the writers David and Amber Lapp note, feel pervasively betrayed: by for-profit job-training outfits that left them awash in debt, by spouses and stepparents, by people who collect federal benefits but don’t work. They’ve stopped even expecting loyalty from their employers. The big flashing lights say: NO TRUST. That leads to an everyone-out-for-himself mentality and Trump’s politics of suspicion. We’ll need a communitarianism.
It is vile for you to isolate, as tainted forever, those that disagree with you and then talk of how we are all in this together. You confused creep. No amount of indoctrination and reeducation to accept the disease that is leftism, will cure the disease.
Maybe the task is to build a ladder of hope. People across America have been falling through the cracks. Their children are adrift. Trump, to his credit, made them visible. We can start at the personal level just by hearing them talk.
Then at the community level we can listen to those already helping. James Fallows had a story in The Atlantic recently noting that while we’re dysfunctional at the national level you see local renaissances dotted across the country. Fallows went around asking, “Who makes this town go?” and found local patriots creating radical schools, arts festivals, public-private partnerships that give, say, high school dropouts computer skills.
Then solidarity can be rekindled nationally. Over the course of American history, national projects like the railroad legislation, the W.P.A. and the NASA project have bound this diverse nation. Of course, such projects can happen again — maybe through a national service program, or something else.
Trump will have his gruesome moment. The time is best spent elsewhere, meeting the neighbors who have become strangers, and listening to what they have to say.