Month: September 2015

Observations on John Boehner Exits, Donald Trump Storms On

First the unified theory of leftism:  To be a leftist is to be a redistributionist.   The REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS is the source of wealth and power for leftism.   A redistributionist is greedy for their accumulated wealth and power.   The leftist’s greed is no different from any other greedy individual.   What a redistributionist tries to do, is hide their greed, and other failings, behind their REDISTRIBUTION MORALITY.   For a while, the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS is a profitable business plan for the leftist that benefits from it (at any level).    The fundamental futility and inferiority of the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS is that it results in INSTITUTIONALIZED FUTILITY OF EFFORT for most people.   The result: LEFT IS FUTILE.

The large problem is that, which more people are realizing, leftism storms on.    The world is a complicated place with many issues to be resolved.   However, the futility of leftism is chief among them.

The article referenced is by Frank Bruni.  September 26, 2015.   John Boehner Exits, Donald Trump Storms On.  Retrieved From:   http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/opinion/sunday/john-boehner-exits-donald-trump-storms-on.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

The author of the referenced article laments the name calling from Donald Trump and the general tactics of some Republicans.    As far as name calling goes Frank starts his own litany, one or more per paragraph, starting from paragraph 3 throughout.   Let’s look at them in order starting from paragraph 3:  there’s pathological and self destructive, diseased (rabid), extreme, childish, crazy, irresponsible, sour and strident, stupid, xenophobic, a spectacle and a farce, and finally he comes full circle back to diseased (sclerosis) again.

The author made some attempt to be fair.  For in paragraph 13 he threw some love Hillary Clinton’s way:

On Thursday, a national poll showed Clinton losing to Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson and Jeb Bush — but not to Donald Trump — in hypothetical matchups. A New Hampshire poll gave Bernie Sanders a sizable lead over Clinton in that state.

And with reports that the F.B.I. was successfully retrieving emails that had supposedly been wiped from her private server, it became clearer than ever that this particular chapter isn’t close to over. It seems almost inevitable that a few of these emails will contradict statements Clinton has made about what was and wasn’t erased and why. I don’t see her “honest and trustworthy” numbers rising anytime soon.

As I recall Hillary Clinton’s rebuttal to the voter’s impression of her, was to say something about how it wouldn’t matter, because her voters “know who is looking out for them.”    Hillary’s rebuttal follows the theme of the REDISTRIBUTION MORALITY as predicted on leftisfutile.com in the unified theory of leftism.

Frank isn’t worried either.   He just thinks the polls will take a while before they improve for Mrs. Clinton to continue running the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS.

…But you have to work with people who you disagree with, sometimes strongly, in order to do the people’s business….   President Obama (as quoted in the referenced article).

I believe what the President means is to switch out the words “people’s business” with REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS.

In recent days the Pope has made efforts to try to distance himself from leftism.    This is good, as do I.   For to join with the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS would be like Jesus joining in with the money changers.   Instead, He overturned their tables….

Through out the referenced article, the author expresses to be frightened and tearful.   I understand it would be troubling to lose one’s power model.   But it is for the best, for the country.

May God bless America, and may God thwart leftism.

Observations on All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists

Trying to avoid futility, I do as much writing as I have time for about the inferiority of the FUTILE AGREEMENT that people make, and how it impacts our cultural heritage and, I think, it needs to be shared more broadly.

The article referenced is by Lawrence M. Krauss.  September 8, 2015.   All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists.  Retrieved From: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists

Here, is how I see, the fundamental point Lawrence makes.

All scientists should be militantly futile:

Because science holds that no idea is sacred, it’s inevitable that it draws people away from religion. The more we learn about the workings of the universe, the more purposeless it seems…

The unifying theory (in this site leftisfutile.com) is that LEFT IS FUTILE.   One constant theme of leftism, that I have categorized into its own space on leftisfutile.com, is the ever present theme of the EVIDENCE FOR FUTILITY.  With his article, Lawrence M. Krauss proselytizes futility, using his EVIDENCE FOR FUTILITY and draws people to the FUTILE AGREEMENT (This is the agreement that human life is fundamentally futile in the universe).

This FUTILE AGREEMENT touches everything; personality, politics, policy, and morality.   So that LEFTISM IS FUNDAMENTALLY FUTILE and LEFTISM IS SYSTEMATICALLY FUTILE.

To be militant is to be political.   Everybody is political for something… even futility.   The author of the subject article advises that ALL scientists should be “militant atheists.”   What can be concluded?

Lawrence M. Krauss is proclaiming that atheism is sacred, as he proclaims that All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists.

Lawrence then proceeds in predictable order to pro-abortion politics.   The vast majority of killing of not-yet-born-human life can be categorized as motivated by convenience.  Meaning, it is not related to rape, incest, or that the pregnancy places at risk the very life of the mother.   This convenience pedestal has its foundation that human life is, after all, fundamentally futile in the universe.   First the woman gets pregnant on the foundational agreement that life is futile in the universe.  The FUTILE AGREEMENT is the JUSTIFICATION FOR FUTILITY (that is, the futility of life justifies irresponsible behavior).   Then FUTILE AGREEMENT justifies killing not-yet-born human life for convenience reasons.

The supposed justification for leftism’s futile machinery of abortion is to harvest dead human life for research to save human life.   What kind of a person is willing to benefit from such futile machinery?   The answer is: a futile mob.   The growing population that agrees with such people, and make the FUTILE AGREEMENT in their own minds.    A futile mob that cares not the difference between a pap smear and the killing of not-yet-born-human life primarily for convenience sake.

I do not trust our leftist FUTILE MORALTY nor do I trust our leftist’s reasoning.   In our society, we find ourselves in a numbers game:   The numbers of futile mob that make the FUTILE AGREEMENT versus those of us that oppose the futile mob because of the inferiority of the futile mind.

Trying to avoid futility, I do as much writing as I have time for, about the inferiority of the FUTILE AGREEMENT that people make, and how it impacts our cultural heritage and, I think, it needs to be shared more broadly.

Observations on No Movement That Embraces Trump Can Call Itself Conservative

The popularity of Donald Trump, in spite of all his problems, is because he fights. Abraham Lincoln said of Ulysses S. Grant, why he put Grant at the head of the US army, “HE FIGHTS!” This popularity of Donald Trump is a rebuke to conservative leadership in that they do not fight. I’m not comparing Donald Trump to Grant. But I do mean to compare our conservative leadership to the string of losing US generals that came before Grant. Yes I do!

The article referenced is by Jonah Goldberg September 5, 2015.  No Movement That Embraces Trump Can Call Itself Conservative.  Retrieved From: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423607/donald-trump-conservative-movement-jonah-goldberg

I think a decent summary of the subject article is that it laments the popularity of Donald Trump because he fights with personal attacks, like leftists. Also it points out flip-flopping, and support for single payer insurance.

I want my leadership to be conservative. It’s not. Conservative leadership is losing because they do not undermine the foundations of leftism. The foundation of leftism is, LEFT IS FUTILE.

I want my leadership to deny the high ground to leftist leadership. I want my leadership to point out the inferior nature of the leftism’s REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS.

To be a leftist is to be a “redistributionist.” Leftism is just a business and power model. The REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS takes from each according to his effort and gives to each according to his vote. These are ever-present themes that come out of leftism. The REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS INSTITUTIONALIZES THE FUTILITY OF EFFORT, both by taking from each according to his effort, and by giving to each according to his vote. This futility is why LEFTISM IS SYSTEMATICALLY FUTILE and therefore inferior to conservatism. However, leftism is very seductive and leftist leadership are as warlords for power.

Again, leftism is just a business and power model, where one can be the animal farm pig by posing as Santa Claus AND then HIDE THE GREED OF LEFTISM and corruption behind the REDISTRIBUTION MORALITY. Leftism is a slick business model and is therefore very seductive, for the self-serving leader and supporter alike. Leftism will attack free enterprise. An example is John Lennon’s “Imagine.” John Lennon never mentioned it would be the animal farm pigs, (from George Orwell) in power over the farm. Point out the GREED OF LEFTISM early ad often.

Leftist leadership, no matter who they are, must be forced to squirm because they have allowed themselves to be seduced by the power model of leftism. And leftism’s affluent supporters must have their FUTILE MORALITY undermined because they allow the leftist leader to hide his corruption and greed only because they run the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS. The attack on leftism does not need to be personal. It just needs to be repeatedly made clear that the very life purpose of leaders and supporters of leftism, is futile and inferior.

Towards the end of the referenced article, Jonah signals his retreat to the wilderness with the sub title “REMNANT HERE I COME.” We are seeing a mutual shrinking dance between conservative leadership and conservative supporters.

Jonah Goldberg wrote a book entitled Liberal Fascism where he went after inferior quality of liberalism. What ever became of those attacks on liberalism pointing out the inherent corruption of the people seduced by it? We don’t have to attack the leftist leader of the moment. We need to undermine the foundations of leftism, that LEFT IS FUTILE, and ridicule the decision to run and seek to grow the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS, as well as the affluent support of the REDISTRIBUTION BUSINESS.